Search found 21 matches
- Tue Dec 28, 2010 3:10 am
- Forum: Camera SDK
- Topic: Units of SetExposure method
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7142
Re: Units of SetExposure method
<t>The problem is I don't use camera with IR illumination. I use V120:slim with external visible light illuminator which frequency is constant of 60Hz. But I cannot assume that my product's end user would use the same frequenccy, so do You have any sugestions on computing the right exposure value? I...
- Mon Dec 27, 2010 7:42 pm
- Forum: Camera SDK
- Topic: Units of SetExposure method
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7142
Units of SetExposure method
<t>Hi,<br/> <br/> Although I've found SetAEC() method very useful it lacks some performance when it comes to severe light conditions. That's why I try to improve it a little bit. During my research I've found that when working with reflected light at some exposure settings the picture I get from the...
- Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:55 pm
- Forum: Camera SDK
- Topic: How does SetAGC work?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3410
Re: How does SetAGC work?
<t>Doug,<br/> <br/> Thanks to your explanationt the idea of AGC seems to be clear now.<br/> Another technical question is about SetExposure and SetThreshold methods. How long does it take (in ms) for camera to stabilize for new values and produce new frame which is for sure acquired with new paramet...
- Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:50 am
- Forum: Camera SDK
- Topic: How does SetAGC work?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3410
How does SetAGC work?
Hi
I'm wondering what should I be aware of when I disable AGC mode?
What's the purpose of this method? Does it adjust Threshold value like AEC does for exposure or is it designed for something else?
Thanks
Konrad
I'm wondering what should I be aware of when I disable AGC mode?
What's the purpose of this method? Does it adjust Threshold value like AEC does for exposure or is it designed for something else?
Thanks
Konrad
- Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:54 am
- Forum: Camera SDK Code Samples
- Topic: AttachListener in the new SDK
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7357
Re: AttachListener in the new SDK
<t>I don't see edit option, so I add it as a reply.<br/> <br/> Everything is clear now. I didn't see Camera object to be passed as a FrameAvailable argument as it was in previous SDK so I thought it should be made some tricky way, but it just needs to instantiate new object which implements cCameraL...
- Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:28 am
- Forum: Camera SDK Code Samples
- Topic: AttachListener in the new SDK
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7357
AttachListener in the new SDK
Hi
Could You please provide me with short example of how to attach FrameAvailable listener in C using the new SDK?
I've found in the doc files that I should use camera->AttachListener() function but it is more tricky I think than it was in C#. Thanks.
Could You please provide me with short example of how to attach FrameAvailable listener in C using the new SDK?
I've found in the doc files that I should use camera->AttachListener() function but it is more tricky I think than it was in C#. Thanks.
- Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:13 pm
- Forum: Camera SDK
- Topic: New Camera SDK 1.0 Final now available
- Replies: 33
- Views: 26796
Re: New Camera SDK 1.0 beta 2 now available
<r>[quote=NaturalPoint - Doug]Suhl, I think you'll like my answers:<br/> [/quote]<br/> Indeed I like your and Birch answers because you both always provide me with good solutions to my problems <E>:)</E><br/> [quote=NaturalPoint - Doug]<br/> 1. ImagerWidth/ImagerHeight return imager size in millimet...
- Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:04 pm
- Forum: Camera SDK
- Topic: New Camera SDK 1.0 Final now available
- Replies: 33
- Views: 26796
Re: New Camera SDK 1.0 beta 2 now available
<t>There is an information in FAQ according to imager size as follows:<br/> <br/> "For the V100, V100R2 and V120:SLIM cameras, the pixel size is 6 microns square, the imager size is 4.5mm x 2.88mm, and the active pixel area is 752x480 (but is windowed to 640x480)."<br/> <br/> I use V120:SLIM camera ...
- Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:56 am
- Forum: Camera SDK
- Topic: New Camera SDK 1.0 Final now available
- Replies: 33
- Views: 26796
Re: New Camera SDK 1.0 beta 1 now available
Are there any plans for porting this SDK to .NET after passing beta tests? I realy like this new functionality in Camera SDK, but I don't know if I should port my apps to native c++, or maybe should wait a little.
- Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:14 pm
- Forum: Camera SDK
- Topic: New Camera SDK 1.0 Final now available
- Replies: 33
- Views: 26796
Re: New Camera SDK 1.0 beta 1 now available
<t>I'm very pleased to see this new SDK. It seems to be much easier to use than the previous version. I'm also glad to see auto AGC and AEC. That's just what I was looking for. I suppose these functions do some real time adjustments to threshold and exposure values. It would be nice to see how they ...