forums.naturalpoint.com

<t>Hi Morgan,<br/> thank you a lot! _Using fLatency I actually get a measure of the delay which appears coherent with the frame rate displayed on TrackingTools. I still wonder why I get so much jitter from the SampleClient, but hopefully it should be fast enough not to affect too much my application...

<t>Hi Morgan,<br/> I believe we have now a quite similar code for the tests. <br/> I have tried using unicast instead of the default multicast and things got better. I believe that the average sample rate is close to 100 Hz, anyway I still have really a lot of jitter. Sometimes I measured duration (...

<t>Hi Morgan,<br/> I have tried to use QueryPerformanceCounter but I measured even worst delay, ranging from 15 to 20 / 25 ms with a lot of jitter. Can you post the code from which you measured 10 ms?<br/> <br/> Also, I still have always a constant zero value in the MeanError field of the rigid body...

Hi Vincent,
I'm using the latest version of TT 2.2 final. I am running both software in the same PC which is running Windows 7 64 bit in order to support 8 Gb of memory.
Thanks again!
Roberto

<t>Hi,<br/> I am interested in using Tracking Tools in order to do remote control of vehicles.<br/> I have downloaded latest version of TT and samples and decided to modify SampleClient.cpp in order to forward small text messages containing rigid body data (position, orientation, error plus a timest...