Search found 6 matches
- Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:21 pm
- Forum: General OptiTrack Support
- Topic: Why is Z 50% too big?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2360
Why is Z 50% too big?
<t>I asked this before, but got no response.<br/> <br/> I've been studying the system in order to obtain precise callibration, and I've come across a variety of issues.<br/> <br/> I've noticed that the Z axis scale appears to be 1.5 times larger than the X/Y axes for position. Why is this?<br/> <br/...
- Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:10 am
- Forum: General OptiTrack Support
- Topic: Serial Control
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2336
Re: Serial Control
There seem to be lots of projects for adding a USB port to a basic stamp; why don't you go that route?
- Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:11 am
- Forum: General OptiTrack Support
- Topic: Center(s) of rotation, position...
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1846
Center(s) of rotation, position...
<t>I'm using the Optitrack SDK with a TrackIR 4 Pro. (Why don't you release the TrackIR SDK?)<br/> <br/> I've been studying the system in order to obtain precise callibration, and I've come across a variety of issues.<br/> <br/> The docs (for the Vector class) state that the center of rotation for t...
- Thu Jan 26, 2006 12:06 pm
- Forum: General OptiTrack Support
- Topic: Why no CLSID_NPVector2 ?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2301
Re: Why no CLSID_NPVector2 ?
So I tried just changing the definition of m_spVector in CameraDlg.h while leaving the call to the CoCreateInstance unchanged, and that seems to work. I think. Why does Microsoft have to make everything harder?
- Thu Jan 26, 2006 11:30 am
- Forum: General OptiTrack Support
- Topic: Why no CLSID_NPVector2 ?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2301
Why no CLSID_NPVector2 ?
<t>First off, let me say that I'm rather unfamiliar with the Microsoft programming environment.<br/> <br/> But in any case, I wanted to take the Optitrack sample VC code and try out using Vector2 instead of Vector. Given that it's a derived class, I figured that I could just add '2's where appropria...
- Thu Jan 26, 2006 11:25 am
- Forum: OptiTrack SDK
- Topic: Minimal necessary C++ code for using device.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 28369
Re: Minimal necessary C++ code for using device.
<t>Here's some rough code that I used:<br/> <br/> code:#include "stdafx.h"<br/> <br/> #include "optitrack.h"<br/> <br/> INPCameraCollection *pCameraCollection;<br/> INPCamera *pCamera;<br/> INPCameraFrame *pFrame;<br/> INPVector *pVector;<br/> <br/> #define HRCHECK(message) if (FAILED(hr)) { fprintf...