I'm just going to keep adding to this list, if that's okay. There isn't a "feature requests" on the main forum list.
To the Rigid Body/Point Cloud API, I would like to have the ability to know which cameras see which points on a rigid body and vice-versa.
Search found 12 matches
- Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:33 pm
- Forum: Tracking Tools
- Topic: Request for features Rigid Body Tool
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4296
- Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:03 pm
- Forum: Tracking Tools
- Topic: Request for features Rigid Body Tool
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4296
Request for features Rigid Body Tool
<t>A button that resets the reported rotation and translation to a user entered value would be useful. This is convenient for calibration from markers to attached rigid bodies e.g. put the rigid body on the object, turn the object to what you want to be zero rotation and zero translation, and hit th...
- Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:58 am
- Forum: Tracking Tools
- Topic: marker asigned to a rigid body
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3843
Re: marker asigned to a rigid body
<t>I would very much also like this information for convenience and efficiency, but determining this information is not too hard. Just apply the rotation then translation of the rigid body to the marker points. Then find the closest points to each marker. They won't line up exactly, but it's impossi...
- Wed Dec 17, 2008 7:29 pm
- Forum: Tracking Tools
- Topic: RB_CameraCount
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2379
RB_CameraCount
<t>Why is it that the result of RB_CameraCount() does not become valid until about 1 second after I initialize the rigid body toolkit? Is there any way to make this instantaneous?<br/> <br/> This works:<br/> RB_InitializeRigidBody(); RB_LoadProfile(np_calib_file.c_str());<br/> RB_LoadDefinition(np_r...
- Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:15 am
- Forum: Tracking Tools
- Topic: Minimization causes vrpn streaming error
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2359
Minimization causes vrpn streaming error
<t>When I minimize the rigid body toolkit application, the vrpn streaming crashes, giving the error: "Unable to Stream Frame". I am using Version 1.3.035 Final B. <br/> <br/> Also, I would like it if I could save my preferences in the application, e.g. save the port number I'm using for vrpn streami...
- Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:47 pm
- Forum: General OptiTrack Support
- Topic: Camera Synchronization
- Replies: 29
- Views: 26120
Re: Camera Synchronization
That did the trick. Checking if the timestamps fell within 1000000 of whatever that timeval (double) is worked like a charm. Cameras synced great now. Thanks.
- Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:22 am
- Forum: General OptiTrack Support
- Topic: Camera Synchronization
- Replies: 29
- Views: 26120
Re: Camera Synchronization
ok, any idea when I can expect a fix for the problem?
- Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:09 am
- Forum: General OptiTrack Support
- Topic: Camera Synchronization
- Replies: 29
- Views: 26120
Re: Camera Synchronization
Alright, thanks, I look forward to hearing from your software developers.
- Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:30 pm
- Forum: General OptiTrack Support
- Topic: Camera Synchronization
- Replies: 29
- Views: 26120
Re: Camera Synchronization
<t>It would be easier if you had c++ sample code that synchronized two cameras. The way I'm doing it currently is<br/> <br/> cameraCollection->Synchronize(), which btw, returns S_OK regardless of the actual result.<br/> <br/> I know the frames are not sychronized is by looking at the result of <br/>...
- Sun Oct 14, 2007 12:28 pm
- Forum: General OptiTrack Support
- Topic: Camera Synchronization
- Replies: 29
- Views: 26120
Re: Camera Synchronization
It's hard to say. The main issue I'm having is that the frame ids do not line up, although sometimes they do, it seems intermittent, but mostly they do not.