Improved Rigid Body Tracking
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:57 am
We've got our OptiTrack 6 camera rigid body tracking working just fine. However I would like to know the time line for software development. Are there any planed improvements to the Rigid Body tracking?
Currently, if I define a rigid body with 4 markers. All 4 markers must be visible for the rigid body to be tracked. A better behavior is if one marker is covered it defaults the 3 remaining markers. So with more markers on a rigid body the more stable the tracking would be. However, with the current implementation the reverse is true.
We've hacked something together where instead of defining a rigid body with all 4 trackers, we've defined four 3-marker rigid bodies using the four possible permutations.
This is currently a hack and works only to an extent and gets complicated when we have 5 or 6 trackers on a rigid body. Is there any plans to get something like this implemented?
Currently, if I define a rigid body with 4 markers. All 4 markers must be visible for the rigid body to be tracked. A better behavior is if one marker is covered it defaults the 3 remaining markers. So with more markers on a rigid body the more stable the tracking would be. However, with the current implementation the reverse is true.
We've hacked something together where instead of defining a rigid body with all 4 trackers, we've defined four 3-marker rigid bodies using the four possible permutations.
This is currently a hack and works only to an extent and gets complicated when we have 5 or 6 trackers on a rigid body. Is there any plans to get something like this implemented?