No NatNetClient in MinGW...got it...depacket then...few questions?

NatNet, VRPN, TrackD, and Plugins
Post Reply
lehthanis
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2022 9:59 am

No NatNetClient in MinGW...got it...depacket then...few questions?

Post by lehthanis »

I'm looking at the PacketClient.cpp example, and I'm wondering if the whole sPacket structure is required for just sending commands to Motive? I don't need to extract any data from the stream, I just need to be able to send a few commands to manage it's state. What's the absolute bare minimum I'd need to accomplish just basic commands using UDP without the NatNetLib?
lehthanis
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2022 9:59 am

Re: No NatNetClient in MinGW...got it...depacket then...few questions?

Post by lehthanis »

It took quite a bit of effort from my team, but we've finally managed to reverse engineer the PacketClient method of sending commands without using the NatNetLib. We're actually sending the packets via Qt's QudpSocket->WriteDatagram function. This is cross-platform capable.
Post Reply