I'm not trying to be argumentative for the sake of being argumentative. I asked who trumps whom to know how to interpret the contradictory information coming from different NaturalPoint employees. You see, after carefully reading this entire discussion
again, I'm still confused about what to take away. Let me try one more time to cite what was said and explain why I'm confused (and how your previous posts did not resolve but exacerbated my confusion).
After saying on 6 May 2008 he would "look into it" (which I interpret to mean "evaluate"), on 29 May 2008 Jim said, "we should support this officially. I have it on the list for the next major revision." He reiterated the same thing to me on 17 Aug 2008.
Nearly a year later on 4 May 2009 Birch said that after "we get those [core features] completed we can begin evaluating additional features." Since it was in response to my asking about keymapping, I interpreted his response to say that keymapping must be evaluated still before it will be included, which
seems to contradict Jim's saying that "we should support this officially. I have it on the list for the next major revision."
On that same day, you said, "I believe that joystick and mouse emulation are toward the top of the list of features we'd like to integrate in this new software. Keyboard mapping is a possibility as well." No matter how you try to obfuscate the contradiction, "it's a possibility" is not saying the same thing as "we should support this officially. I have it on the list for the next major revision." You're only calling it a "possibility" now, not even a "probability".
Furthermore, I thought today was the appropriate day to ask for status on this feature request when Birch implied that it would be time to talk about it after the core features get polished. Are the core features not polished? They must be if the beta period has come to and end, right? Besides, if the core features weren't polished at this stage, would you imply that NaturalPoint has stopped development on 5.x for now? In just this last post you said, "[w]hen we do begin development on 5.x again, I'm sure that we will take all suggestions and requests into consideration--including various mapping and emulation options."
This is disappointing on several levels. First, I was led to believe that this would happen. I think any reasonable person would have interpreted what Jim said in the same way that I did. Second, I was expecting new features in 5.x, but we just have a pretty GUI for it without significant enhancements in functionality. Third, I paid for TrackIR and have recommended it to lots of my flight sim buddies (which was at least 20 sales for you guys over the years, not including what those buddies might have recommended to their friends). Yet, on the software end, TrackIR has remained static, and the titles of supporting games has been very slow to grow. To make matters more frustrating, a
freeware alternative to TrackIR supports basic keymapping built right into the software. Who cares about your more aesthetically pleasing interface when a
freeware alternative has better core functionality?