Search found 18 matches

by genetunik
Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:25 pm
Forum: Tracking Tools
Topic: Calibration problems between 2.00 Beta and 2.3.1
Replies: 3
Views: 1981

Re: Calibration problems between 2.00 Beta and 2.3.1

<t>Hi Seth, thanks for getting back to me. I selected the 1-Marker Calibration but what I did not do was adjust the "Max Marker Size" of the marker under "Filter Type." This must be different between the 2 versions of Tracking Tools. In version 2.3.1 it is set to 150 so I increased it to 800 and it ...
by genetunik
Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:37 pm
Forum: Tracking Tools
Topic: Calibration problems between 2.00 Beta and 2.3.1
Replies: 3
Views: 1981

Calibration problems between 2.00 Beta and 2.3.1

<t>Hello, I updated my Tracking Tools version from 2.00 Beta to 2.3.1 Final and once I did I was not able to calibrate using single-marker wand calibration. Once I click "Start Wanding" to calibrate in 2.3.1, the movement of the marker is not traced in green until I move the marker way outside the o...
by genetunik
Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:56 pm
Forum: Tracking Tools
Topic: Exporting data from Tracking Tools
Replies: 0
Views: 907

Exporting data from Tracking Tools

Hello,
I keep trying to export data from Tracking Tools into a CSV file but the data keeps getting clipped! Any solutions? Can the data be exported from Tracking Tools into a database? Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks!
by genetunik
Fri Feb 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Forum: Tracking Tools
Topic: External Sync Using Optihub
Replies: 5
Views: 3351

External Sync Using Optihub

<t>Hello, I'm trying to use my optihub and a TTL to externally sync-in my optitrack cameras to start recording but I can find no option in the optitrack program (2.00 Beta) to adjust any sort of optihub settings. Do I need to download a newer version of optitrack or an add-on program to use external...
by genetunik
Fri Feb 04, 2011 8:42 am
Forum: General OptiTrack Support
Topic: OPTIHUB
Replies: 2
Views: 1875

OPTIHUB

<t>Hi,<br/> I have a question about the optihub (used with the R1 cameras and rigid body toolkit / SDK).<br/> I know that the Optihub allows me to sync my cameras with a peripheral device. However, I am curious if I also have the ability to start-stop acquiring (and saving) camera data based on exte...
by genetunik
Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:32 pm
Forum: General OptiTrack Support
Topic: virtual marker
Replies: 1
Views: 889

virtual marker

<t>Hi,<br/> I am using tracking tools. If I have a rigid body defined with 4 markers and one goes out of view, is it's coordinates still recorded (by virtue of tracking tools knowing the position of the other 3 markers and that they all make a rigid body). <br/> <br/> If not, is it possible to defin...
by genetunik
Wed Sep 09, 2009 12:32 pm
Forum: OptiTrack Data Streaming
Topic: Streaming Question
Replies: 19
Views: 15213

Re: Streaming Question

Hi,
I am trying to use NatNet to stream rigid body data using Matlab. Can you please help me get started. Any advice would help greatly.
Thanks,
Gene
by genetunik
Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:17 am
Forum: OptiTrack Data Streaming
Topic: data streaming real-time
Replies: 1
Views: 1650

data streaming real-time

<t>Hi optitrak experts,<br/> I am trying to use the SDK to stream data from a marker (or rigid body) to a live display of a bar or a line chart...so for example, as the marker is moved vertically, the vertical position change is displayed as a bar line plot in real time). We have used the sample SDK...
by genetunik
Fri May 29, 2009 6:50 pm
Forum: General OptiTrack Support
Topic: External Triggering of Optitrak
Replies: 9
Views: 4790

Re: External Triggering of Optitrak

Hi,
I thought I'd check in to see when the release is planned for the next version that will allow external triggering. Also, I wanted to verify that this will be available for the rigid body tool kit and not just arena.

Thanks,
Gene
by genetunik
Tue May 05, 2009 5:11 pm
Forum: General OptiTrack Support
Topic: External Triggering of Optitrak
Replies: 9
Views: 4790

Re: External Triggering of Optitrak

<t>Hi Jim,<br/> Thank you for your reply.<br/> Those do indeed sound like clever alternative solutions. I really am waiting on the edge of my seat for this new update to have a more traditional triggering mechanism (listening for or outputting a TTL). It is pretty much the only thing holding me back...