Tracking a small robot

Post Reply
ciVic
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:48 am

Tracking a small robot

Post by ciVic »

Hi,

in my research lab we are working with the small humanoid robot Nao by Aldebaran Robotics [Aldebaran Robotics]. To investigate the executed motions we would like to use OptiTrack to track the real positions and orientations of the chest and the limbs of the robot. But we are not sure, if it is possible to track such small rigid bodies? The length of one body is ca. 10cm.
DonBurroni
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 2:26 am
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: Tracking a small robot

Post by DonBurroni »

yes i think it will work,
NaturalPoint - Mike
Posts: 1896
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:41 am
Location: Corvallis, OR

Re: Tracking a small robot

Post by NaturalPoint - Mike »

10cm? Shouldn't be a problem. What size volume do you want to use for motion analysis?
ciVic
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:48 am

Re: Tracking a small robot

Post by ciVic »

It would be perfect to be able to track the robot on a field of 4x6 meters. But i think this would lower the resolution of the system too much, so in special setups we also could use a field of 1x1 or 1x0.5 meters. What would be the resolution of the tracked positions?
NaturalPoint - Mike
Posts: 1896
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:41 am
Location: Corvallis, OR

Re: Tracking a small robot

Post by NaturalPoint - Mike »

This depends entirely on the size of the markers, really.

If you are using V100R2 cameras and 5/8 markers, a 4x6m volume may be pushing it, but depending on your camera count and arrangement it may be obtainable to within sub-millimeter precision.
ciVic
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:48 am

Re: Tracking a small robot

Post by ciVic »

So would it be better to use a larger number of V100R2 or a smaller number of S250e (beside its advantage of a higher frequency)?
NaturalPoint - Mike
Posts: 1896
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:41 am
Location: Corvallis, OR

Re: Tracking a small robot

Post by NaturalPoint - Mike »

We have been finding in testing that a smaller number of S250e cameras, when properly oriented, can outperform a higher number of V100R2 cameras due to the increase in framerate, and the higher resolution.

This would not work as well in high occlusion rate scenarios (2 actor motion capture, et. cetera). You would have to raise the number of S250e cameras closer to the number of V100R2 cameras to overcome that occlusion.
ColinJones
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:37 pm

Re: Tracking a small robot

Post by ColinJones »

Hi - I've got a similar setup that I'm hoping someone can help me with.

I'm trying to track small car robots (10cm x 4cm) that move fairly quickly (max 3m/s) in a space about 6m x 4m. I'd like to have very small hemispherical markers on them (ideally 3-4mm), mostly for aesthetic reasons, but would also consider using active LEDs.

I was considering a set of 12 s250e cameras, but am having a lot of trouble figuring out what this setup is capable of in terms of resolution and whether it could actually handle this situation?

(In the future I'd like to have another set of small robots flying in this space, so ideally I'd like to track 4mm markers in 6m x 4m x 3m)

Thanks for any help!
Colin
NaturalPoint - Mike
Posts: 1896
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:41 am
Location: Corvallis, OR

Re: Tracking a small robot

Post by NaturalPoint - Mike »

12x S250e's would work well in this environment with active markers. A 4mm hemispherical marker such as our facial markers are only detectable by S250e cameras at approximately 12 feet. Beyond that, they appear as a single pixel or less, and precision is lost.
Post Reply